Want to know if that attractive-looking advert for a gambling system is a loser?
I’ve spent the last few many years poring over every single junk piece of wagering literature. I consider myself an expert within the subject. I am a connoisseur of dreadful mail-order programs. If someone in Denver is composing a few ghastly streak betting program, I can smell it a number of thousand miles away here in England. We have a finely honed bullshit detector.
The very first and easiest principle to determine regardless of whether a program is valueless or not I will christen May’s Primary Law Of Hucksterism. This law states that a wagering program sold through mail buy is by definition worthless. This blanket statement is rather accurate. Mail buy system-sellers are virtually universally charlatans who prey on human credulity and superstition. "Mail" and "online" are truly interchangeable, also, the major difference being that online scamming is more cost-effective and more efficient.
The majority of mail-order techniques depend on luck, a number of wagering progression, "card-clumping" or a few other type of pseudo-theory. Luck, for all practical purposes, will not exist. Luck is usually a medieval concept. Try to win at betting from the use of a charmed amulet or lucky coin and you will slowly but definitely receive wiped out. You would be much better off heading into politics preparing your career for the predictions of the entrails of the chicken.
Wagering progressions, it is universally agreed, do not present you with a long-term edge above the house in a game of independent trials. They do transform the distribution of wins and losses. Which tends to make them great for technique sellers who can say anything "you will win 75 % of all sessions" in total honesty. I can do much better than that. Test doubling your wager each and every time you shed. Then you might win all of one’s sessions. Except for one, that can be the one by which you shed everything.
Pseudo-theorists are one of the most lethal type of huckster. They cloud their pitch for any worthless program in confusing verbose language intended to wow the customer with their intellect. This can be like toothpaste advertisements proceeding on about fluoride. Know what variation fluoride would make to toothpaste? Me neither. In the very same way you might find hucksters talk about Hypogenic non-linear congruential clumping method. When challenged as to what that really indicates, they’ll go "Ah…200 dollars please".
There can be the innovative pseudo-theorist. The state-of-the-art pseudo-theorist provides a program that will beat a game like baccarat banque or roulette with card-counting or wheel watching. These strategies usually are not fully understood by the greatest of mathematicians. They are certainly not understood with the pseudo-theorist either, but he knows that it’s extremely difficult to contradict his technique when the topic is unbelievably complex. Even if someone does expose the system-seller, it is almost not possible to explain in layman’s terms why the procedure won’t work.